Tomorrow morning yours truely is going to partake in a debate focused around the question of: "Did the US use the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as intimidation against the USSR during the post-war period." My team's side is the opposition to this point. While it is true that everyone who is on the affirmative side has easy access to this blog, I doubt anyone will read it anyways. Our main points for our argument is going to be that the United States had a clearer and more humanitarian standpoint during the era and would not have wiped out 200,000 citizens to simply gain an upper hand over another country (who we were allied with at the time!) It seems that this is the strongest counter-point against our opponets in this race. Due to the fact that many sites on the internet back our debate topic's claim, it became much more difficult to find reputable sites and sources that would help our team much at all, so what we had to do was simply buckle down and learn alot of background happenings before and during the beginnings of the Cold War. These findings let us draw many conclusions based upon the relations between the two countries during the time of the bombing and after.I think that our team will do really well tomorrow, and I'm looking forward to Spring Break like crazy, so either way I win.


